More
on Matrixing
Grant has well covered the phenomena that we at TAPS refer
to as “matrixing”. In my research I have also
found numerous occasions where this has led to problems within
the paranormal field. However, do not think that ours is the
only branch of study that has taken casualties from it. The
following should help us understand the consequences of falling
into the dual traps of matrixing and an over-zealous desire
to prove a haunting.
During the late nineteen hundreds there was widespread speculation
that there was life on Mars. Not simple single cell life,
but a technologically advanced species. Telescopes at this
time were not nearly as advanced as they are today, and many
astronomers scurried to decipher the images that they saw
of the red planet through these scopes. In 1877 an Italian
astronomer named Giovanni Schiaparelli observed what appeared
to be faint lines crisscrossing the surface of Mars. He named
these in his notes “canalli” meaning channels.
Other contemporaries of Giovanni also made similar observations
and a few began mapping them, such as an Irish astronomer
Charles M. Burton. Others across the globe began mapping these
features with varying degrees of complexity.
One American astronomer, Percival Lowell seemed bent on proving
that there was indeed advanced life on Mars. He took Schaparelli’s
work to an extreme. Perhaps his first mistake was that “canalli”
was misinterpreted in English to “canals” rather
then “channels” as was meant. Percival pushed
this idea, and did extend his findings to the public. His
mapping was very in-depth; insomuch that even Schiaparelli
doubted Lowell’s research. Still, Lowell was unbending
in his discoveries. Not all agreed with him, however. In 1903
experiments were conducted by scientists J.E. Evans and Edward
Maunder proving that the apparent lines seen on Mars were
in fact a form of optical illusion mentally enhanced by those
seeking to prove the life on Mars theory. It was also noted
that the maps of the various canals by different astronomers
did not match. By 1909 with the use of an 83 cm telescope
Eugene Antonaidi helped to disprove the theory. It was finally
laid to rest in 1965 when space probe Mariner four arrived
at the much-debated planet.
This should show the inherent danger in both matrixing as
well as the need to substantiate at whatever cost. So, by
all means, keep taking those pictures. The evidence will come
faster if we all keep Grant’s simple protocols in mind.
We may have these astronomers to thank though. It was widely
speculated that many Science fiction writers drew inspiration
from this debate including H.G. Wells.
-Mike
(TAPS)
Discuss this on the Message
Boards |